A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving possible neighbours in excess of the development of the wall in a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario that has captivated national interest adhering to an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed household home at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Times article about René Collier as well as the Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed into a hugely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction operates at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a company director respectively, search for to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes together Ireland’s coastline, the place enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of recognized people. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their possible neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted under organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their preparing permission by creating a wall further than the boundaries in their site, leading to an encroachment on the Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as a result places are issue to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Of their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have lasting ecological consequences, significantly in the delicate coastal ecosystem which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their arranging permission, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the correct placement. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion as an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The few accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding in order to protect their view, an allegation that's been recurring in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal planning disputes, in which views of the sea are both of those very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waist-high water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, a picture that has since come to be emblematic in the intensity on the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they were intended to gather visual proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 Guys entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm drinking water to photograph the location became The most hanging descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into a place affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up covered intimately with the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as viewers sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to further submissions on whether interim orders must be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital second during the legal timeline.
At the core from the dispute is really a disagreement in excess of boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was accredited and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be described as meticulous in his assessment of organizing documents, maps, and conditions hooked up on the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving a private check out, insisting as an alternative that it is about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they may have explained their prolonged-standing link to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few only seeking to make a relatives household in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Place of Conservation and say that all works are already completed according to Experienced advice and permitted ideas. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include coming into the sea through a storm, never change the fundamental facts.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how planning disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of building of wall at coastal site is now a shorthand description for just a condition a large number of observers see as ever more frequent. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Times write-up about René Collier pointed out the businessman experienced Formerly been involved with area advocacy on preparing and environmental troubles, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from pretty distinct Qualified backgrounds can find themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have become synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-superior water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-substantial drinking René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times water all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Times are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Actual physical actuality of your coastline and also the symbolic character of your act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these actions shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an excessive method.
As the High Court proceedings continue on, the outcome stays unsure. The court docket should determine whether or not the wall as crafted complies with organizing permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Particular Area of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and arranging conditions. Still the human factor continues to be central: neighbours who will have to Stay alongside one another prolonged after the lawful prices are paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about construction is effective at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, though the implications of the case extend over and above that handle. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. What's more, it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental problems which include environmental security and assets rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays an area of normal splendor and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre on the dispute stands partially constructed, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful thoughts. Regardless of whether it's going to in the end be altered, eliminated, or done as prepared will rely upon the courtroom’s results. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will most likely keep on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to Probably the most carefully watched scheduling disputes in north Dublin lately.